No Script

Please Wait...

Ashura 2020


FP: US Lawmakers Demand to See the Side Deals in Trump’s Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia

FP: US Lawmakers Demand to See the Side Deals in Trump’s Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia
folder_openUnited States access_time2 months ago
starAdd to favorites

By Staff

The Foreign Policy revealed that several Democratic lawmakers are demanding that the US administration disclose the details of side deals connected with US arms exports to Saudi Arabia, maintaining that the so-called offsets undercut the financial benefits of weapons sales touted by the White House. 

The push by six House Democrats led by Rep. Katie Porter of California is just the latest tussle between Capitol Hill and the commander in chief over the cozy relationship between the White House and Gulf nations. 

The lawmakers want the administration to release information on the deals, negotiated between Saudi officials and US military contractors that allow Riyadh to onshore some manufacturing and technology as part of an effort to grow its defense industry. Last month, the Foreign Policy reported that the Trump administration is in discussions to end a decades-long practice of informally notifying the Congress about US arms sales. The administration is contemplating another major arms deal with Saudi Arabia—this one for precision-guided munitions—that includes significant offsets, a congressional aide said. 

But lawmakers said the practice of brokering the side deals, which they referred to as “sweeteners,” largely discredit Trump’s claims that deals inked under his administration could lead to “over a million” new American jobs. An analysis by the Center for International Policy put the total number of jobs created by Trump’s arms sales to Saudi Arabia at between 20,000 and 40,000. 

“We write to you because we believe that the Trump administration has grossly exaggerated the economic benefits of arms exports, particularly to Saudi Arabia,” the lawmakers wrote to Cordell Hull, the acting undersecretary of commerce for industry and security. “Further, we believe that the extraordinary transfer of military technology to Saudi Arabia as part of recent arms sales may undermine the American 'defense' industrial capacity and fuel violence in the Middle East.”

Democratic lawmakers have sought to further scrutinize arms sales to the Middle East since the Trump administration declared a May 2019 national security emergency to override congressional opposition and force through 22 arms sales to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan—drawing a stinging congressional rebuke. The Trump administration, for its part, has touted arms sales as a means of deepening diplomatic relations with a host of foreign partners. Two months later, War Secretary Mark Esper faced strong pushback from Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren over his refusal to extend his recusal from decisions involving Raytheon, which makes precision-guided bombs sold to Saudi Arabia. Esper is a former top lobbyist for Raytheon. 

Porter and fellow California Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier, who is also a signatory on the letter sent Tuesday, have also pushed back on Pentagon requests that would narrow lobbying restrictions for former generals and senior officials, allowing them to advocate on behalf of military contractors one year after leaving positions at the companies, instead of two years after. 

“Giving this kind of military technology to the Gulf states is cause for concern,” Porter told Foreign Policy in an emailed statement. “Congress must investigate, not only because these sales undermined human rights and regional security but also because they may have undermined our own defense industrial capacity.”