Alahednews
english.alahednews.com.lb
Al-Ahed Telegram
Sayyed Nasrallah: Resistance Arms Basis of Lebanon’s Security, Islamic-Christian Co-existence A Must Kremlin: Russia Sees No Alternative to Iran Nuke Deal ADHRB Calls for Sheikh Salman’s Release, Fears He Could Receive Death Sentence «Israeli» Soldiers Celebrate As They Shoot Palestinians in W Bank OPCW Finds No Chemical Weapons at Syrian Facilities Bombed by US ’Will Destroy Russian S-300 Missiles in Syria If Warplanes Are Targeted,’ ’Israel’ Claims Taliban «To Focus On Killing, Capturing» US Forces Brussels II: Syria Conference Day 2 Opens With Emphasis on Political Solution Putin: Several States Play into Hands of Terrorists Trump Wipes Dandruff Off Visiting French President Macron! #EU's #Mogherini: #Iran #NuclearDeal «Needs To Be Preserved» #UK Minister: High Probability of A #Brexit Deal With #EU #Russia to Deliver New Air #Defense Systems to #Syria #Russian MoD: #OPCW Confirms Absence of Chemical Weapons in #Damascus Research Lab #Bahrain Judiciary Sets June 21st for the Trial of Sheikh #AliSalman Earthquake Hits Southeast #Turkey, Dozens Injured #Lavrov Says US Has No Intention To Leave #Syria Sayyed #Nasrallah: There has been a very negative atmosphere in #Jbeil and #Kiserwan nomination Sayyed #Nasrallah: Juan #Hbeish made a symbolic move that reflects mutual respect and the "key of #Jbeil and #Kiserwan" remains with President #Aoun and Patriarch al-#Rahi Sayyed Nasrallah: Every weapon carried by a #Christian in the villages of the northern #Bekaa is that of #resistance because it’s carried to protect his country
Guestbook mailinglist.php arabic site french site spanish site facebook twitter rss page
News Categories » NEWS » Middle East » Zionist Entity

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size  Print Page
«Israeli» Settlement Boycotters to Be Punished Under New US Bill
Local Editor

Amidst the attempts to crush anti-"Israeli" movements, US Senator Ben Cardin is once again trying to pass legislation designed to suppress the boycott, divestment and sanctions [BDS] movement for Palestinian rights.

Illegal

During the last Congressional session, the Maryland Democrat succeeded in sneaking language into a must-pass trade bill making it a "principal negotiating objective" of the US "to discourage politically motivated actions to boycott, divest from or sanction ‘Israel'" while negotiating trade deals.

This discouragement of BDS extended to boycotts of products originating from settlements in what the bill euphemistically referred to as "‘Israeli'-controlled territories." All of the "Israeli" settlements in the occupied West Bank and Syria's Golan Heights are illegal under international law.

But with the Trump administration's skepticism toward free trade deals and its withdrawal of the US from the controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership, it seems unlikely that the US in the near term will be leveraging anti-BDS pressure through trade negotiations as Cardin envisioned.

With BDS continuing to gain momentum, Cardin went back to the drawing board and introduced the "Israel" Anti-Boycott Act on 23 March, designed to coincide with the annual policy conference of the American "Israel" Public Affairs Committee.

The powerful "Israel" lobby group duly made the bill one of its top legislative priorities.

The Senate version of the bill - S.720 - currently has 18 cosponsors - 14 Republicans and four Democrats.

Its counterpart in the House - H.R.1697 - introduced by Illinois Republican Peter Roskam, has 91 co-sponsors at present, about two-thirds of them Republicans.

The bill opposes the creation of a database of "Israeli" settlement companies by the UN Human Rights Council and any efforts to boycott those companies' products.

According to Cardin and the other original sponsors of the "Israel" Anti-Boycott Act, the bill also seeks to "prevent the implementation of similar ‘blacklists' or boycotts in the future."

It aims to do so in a heavy-handed manner: by imposing governmental sanctions - denial of loans, fines and even potentially jail time - on companies complying with calls from the UN Human Rights Council to boycott "Israeli" settlement products.

If it becomes law, the bill could also sweep up in its broad ambit companies refusing to do business with Israeli settlements whatever their source of inspiration for doing so may be. These sanctions would also apply to potential future international governmental calls for a broader boycott of "Israel".

The draconian nature of the bill is shrewdly shrouded. None of the above-mentioned sanctions are specified in the actual text of the bill.

Only by closely examining the underlying laws which would be amended by this bill does its intent become evident: to harshly punish those companies which exercise their First Amendment-protected right to engage in boycotts of Israeli settlement products.

The bill seeks to amend two laws - the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 - to accomplish its aim.

The Export Administration Act is the primary law which makes it illegal for US corporations to comply with the Arab League boycott of "Israel". The Department of Commerce maintains an Office of Anti-Boycott Compliance to ensure US corporations do not participate in the Arab League boycott and to fine those that do.

The "Israel" Anti-Boycott Act would amend this law to encompass "restrictive trade practices or boycotts fostered or imposed by any international governmental organization against ‘Israel' or requests to impose restrictive trade practices or boycotts by any international governmental organization against ‘Israel'."

Even if a corporation was not responding directly to a call from an international governmental organization to boycott the "Israeli" entity or even settlement products, it could still run afoul of this bill if its actions are perceived to "have the effect of furthering or supporting" this boycott.

The potential penalties for violating this bill are steep: a minimum $250,000 civil penalty and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years imprisonment, as stipulated in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The bill specifies that international governmental organizations include the UN and EU, a clear indication the legislation is intended to counteract the limited steps the UN Human Rights Council has taken to catalog "Israeli" settlement products and the EU's labeling - but not prohibition - of those products.

Source: EI, Edited by website team

19-04-2017 | 13:38


Name
E-Mail
Comment Title
Comment
Human Verification


News Coverage

Related News

Search
To Top